UXFixUXFix
Language
Audit my store
Eddiebauer logo

Eddiebauer

eddiebauer.com

We found 34 issues in Eddiebauer's checkout, a modelled 14.6–44.8% of conversions.

Audit run by UXFix on 8 September 2026 against 115 rules. Every finding below is shown with the screen we captured, in the order they cost conversions. Nothing here was sponsored or reviewed by the store.

Audit by Abdulhameid Grandoka

Audit date
8 September 2026
Issues found
34
Est. conversion loss
14.6–44.8%
Rules run
115
AI Shoppers score
58/100
Overall checkout score
62/100
FDCBA

Grade C, needs work. Most points are lost on forms and trust.

Score breakdown by category

Each category is scored 0–100 from the rules that apply to it.

forms
39

Errors preserve entered data (never clear the form on error). Total form fields 8 or fewer (industry average is 11.3). And 7 more.

trust
48

Delivery expectation shown before final purchase. Trust/security signals visible near payment step. And 2 more.

decision
48

Add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile. Delivery/arrival date estimate shown. And 4 more.

momentum
53

Express wallet options (Apple/Google/Shop Pay) present in cart. Line items editable in place (qty, variant, remove) without page reload. And 2 more.

mobile
58

Largest Contentful Paint under 2.5s on mobile. Tap targets at least 44x44 px on all interactive elements. And 3 more.

How Eddiebauer compares

Across 28 audited stores, as of 9 September 2026. Method and full ranking: the UXFix ecommerce benchmark.

This store
62/100
Benchmark median
58/100
Benchmark mean
58.7/100
Rank
8 of 28

Scores above 74% of audited stores

What we checked

The same rule pass UXFix runs on every store. No store data and no analytics access — everything below was observable from the public storefront.

  1. 1
    A full purchase walk on desktop and mobile

    Product page to payment step, one real product, both viewports.

  2. 2
    Cost transparency at every step

    When shipping, tax and totals first become visible to the shopper.

  3. 3
    Form and field behaviour

    Field count, labels, autofill, error placement, recovery after a failed submit.

  4. 4
    Trust signals where money is entered

    Payment marks, security copy, returns and contact reachability at the pay step.

  5. 5
    Mobile ergonomics

    Tap target sizes, thumb reach, keyboard type, viewport zoom on focus.

  6. 6
    Machine readability

    Whether an AI shopping agent can read price, stock and shipping from the page.

What we could not check: 20 rules could not be judged from the public storefront on the date above. They were dropped from the score, not guessed at.

Results: 53 rules passed, 14 partial, 28 failed

115 rules were run. 20 could not be assessed and were dropped rather than guessed, leaving 95 scored. A further 3 findings are held back from this page because our wording for them was not fit to publish.

53 passing~14 partial28 failing?20 not assessable

What Eddiebauer does well

Rules already passing. No action needed on any of these.

  • Price and availability present in DOM as text (not JS/image only)
  • llms.txt present at root; product URLs not bot-blocked
  • Canonical URLs stable; variant URLs machine-readable and permanent
  • Cart state reachable via stable URL or API endpoint
  • No session trap that breaks agent-driven cart hydration

Where it falls short

The issues, in the order they appear below.

  • Errors preserve entered data (never clear the form on error)2–5.2%
  • Full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry0.9–2.3%
  • Add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile0.8–2.1%
  • Delivery/arrival date estimate shown0.8–2.1%
  • Stock/availability state explicit (in stock, low stock, out of stock)0.8–2.1%
  • Shipping estimator (ZIP/country) available in cart0.8–2.1%
  • Express wallet options (Apple/Google/Shop Pay) present in cart0.8–2.1%
  • Total form fields 8 or fewer (industry average is 11.3)0.8–2.1%
Partial, worth a look

Right idea, wrong placement or timing: full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry, reviews present with summary rating visible above fold and returns/exchange policy visible on PDP (not buried in footer). And 11 more.

We find what your eyes skip.
Product page, cart and checkout, walked, scored, and priced in one pass.
Scan my store →

Findings: 34 issues, ranked by estimated conversion loss

Each finding shows the screen as we captured it on 8 September 2026, what the problem is, and what it costs in conversions.

01CriticalCHK-016 · formsCheckout

Errors preserve entered data (never clear the form on error)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

When the checkout form has an error, the store clears out information the shopper already typed correctly.

Why it matters

A shopper who typed their address once and lost it to a form error frequently will not type it twice. This is a critical-severity leak at the very end of the funnel, where every lost buyer was seconds from paying.

Impact
2–5.2%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
02CriticalCHK-031 · paymentCheckout

Full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry

Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.
Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The full order total (including shipping and tax) isn't visible before the buyer starts entering payment details.

Why it matters

Surprise costs at the payment step are the #1 abandonment trigger in every study. Buyers want the final number before their card leaves the wallet.

Impact
0.9–2.3%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
03HighPDP-002 · decisionProduct page

Add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pagePhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PMA cookie banner (or chat window) was open when we took this picture; the check concerns the page behind it.

The problem

The Add-to-Cart button is not visible above the fold on mobile. Shoppers have to scroll to find how to buy.

Why it matters

On mobile especially, buyers scan the top of the page and decide within seconds. If the primary purchase button isn't in that first view, many will leave before scrolling.

What to do

Add a sticky 'Add to Cart' bar pinned to the bottom of the viewport (below the color swatches area) with the $171.75 price and a bright green button matching the Asparagus swatch color so it's tappable without scrolling.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
04HighPDP-005 · decisionProduct page

Delivery/arrival date estimate shown

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PM

The problem

The product page doesn't tell shoppers when their order will arrive. There is no delivery date or lead-time estimate.

Why it matters

Buyers often decide between two stores based on delivery timing, especially for gifts and urgent purchases. Uncertain timing pushes them to competitors who are clear.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
05HighPDP-006 · decisionProduct page

Stock/availability state explicit (in stock, low stock, out of stock)

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PM

The problem

The product page doesn't clearly say whether the item is in stock, low stock, or out of stock.

Why it matters

Stock signals affect two decisions. "In stock" builds confidence. "Only 3 left" adds urgency. Silence makes shoppers hesitate.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
06HighCRT-002 · transparencyCart

Shipping estimator (ZIP/country) available in cart

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:40 PM

The problem

The cart has no shipping estimator; shoppers can't preview shipping costs without starting checkout.

Why it matters

Unknown shipping costs are the single biggest cause of cart abandonment. An estimator answers the question before it becomes a reason to leave.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
07HighCRT-011 · momentumCart

Express wallet options (Apple/Google/Shop Pay) present in cart

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:40 PM

The problem

The cart doesn't offer any express wallet button (Apple Pay, Google Pay, Shop Pay, PayPal Express).

Why it matters

Express wallets skip 60-80% of the checkout form. Shop Pay alone lifts checkout completion by ~1.7x. On mobile especially, one tap vs six form fields is the biggest single conversion lever left in ecommerce.

What to do

Add a row of branded express wallet buttons (Apple Pay, PayPal, Google Pay) directly above or below the black 'Checkout+ | $93.50' button in the Order Summary panel so shoppers can skip manual checkout entry.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
08HighCHK-009 · formsCheckout

Total form fields 8 or fewer (industry average is 11.3)

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The checkout has more than 8 form fields. Industry-best checkouts collect 6-8 fields; industry-average is 11.3.

Why it matters

Every extra field drops conversion by roughly 2%. Fields cost you money in a direct, measurable way. A checkout with 13 fields loses ~10% of buyers compared to one with 8.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
09HighCHK-012 · formsCheckout

Address autocomplete (Google/Loqate) present

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The checkout has no address autocomplete (Google Places, Loqate, SmartyStreets, or similar). Shoppers type every line of their address manually.

Why it matters

Address autocomplete cuts address-entry time roughly in half on mobile and drops delivery-failure rates from typos. It also feels premium, buyers notice.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
10HighCHK-038 · trustCheckout

Delivery expectation shown before final purchase

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The checkout page does not show when the order will arrive. Buyers commit to buying without knowing the delivery date.

Why it matters

Delivery timing is often the deciding factor between two stores. If your competitor tells the buyer "arrives Tuesday" and you say nothing, you lose. Especially for gifts.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
11HighPDP-A01 · agentAI Shoppers

Complete Product schema.org: price, availability, GTIN/SKU, rating, shipping details

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PM

The problem

The structured product data that AI shopping agents read (ChatGPT, Google, Copilot) is incomplete on this page. Some or all of these are missing: product ID (GTIN), brand, review data, availability, shipping details.

Why it matters

AI-referred traffic converts 42% higher than regular traffic (Adobe, 2026). But agents only recommend stores whose product data they can read. Incomplete data means invisible to AI shoppers.

Impact
0–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
12HighCHK-A01 · agentAI Shoppers

Machine checkout readiness signals (ACP/UCP endpoints declared)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The checkout has no signals declaring it can be driven by AI agents. No ACP or UCP meta tags, no /.well-known/agentic-commerce endpoint, no Stripe ACP integration.

Why it matters

OpenAI's Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP) and Google's Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) are the emerging standards for agent-driven checkout. Stores that declare readiness get preferential routing from ChatGPT and Google AI. This is 2026's biggest new distribution channel.

Impact
0–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
13HighPDP-018 · confidenceProduct page

Reviews present with summary rating visible above fold

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PM

The problem

The product page shows no star rating or review summary above the fold. Shoppers have to scroll to find social proof.

Why it matters

Ratings are the fastest trust signal on a product page. A shopper who lands and doesn't see any social proof in the first view assumes it's a low-quality product or a new store.

What to do

Since the product has 0 reviews, consider hiding the empty star row or replacing it with a 'Be the first to review' CTA link near the price ($171.75) to encourage engagement instead of showing an empty rating.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
14HighPDP-022 · confidenceProduct page

Returns/exchange policy visible on PDP (not buried in footer)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PM

The problem

There's no returns or exchange policy communicated on the product page itself. Shoppers have to hunt the footer or FAQ to find it.

Why it matters

"What if I don't like it?" is the last question in every purchase. If the answer isn't obvious, hesitation kills conversion, especially for higher-price items and apparel.

What to do

Add a short inline returns line (e.g. 'Free returns within 60 days') directly under the price/ADD TO CART button like the Klarna financing text, so the policy is visible without expanding the 'SHIPPING & RETURNS' accordion at the bottom of the details list.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
15HighPDP-029 · frictionProduct page

No aggressive popup covering PDP within first 10 seconds

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PM

The problem

An aggressive popup (newsletter, discount, chat prompt) covers this product page shortly after it loads. Cookie banners don't count; this is the newsletter-style overlay.

Why it matters

Popups on first visit interrupt intent. First-time shoppers are still evaluating; a modal that blocks the price or ATC is a fast way to lose them.

What to do

The 'Extra 20% Off!' vertical black tab on the left edge doesn't block the product image or ATC button, but it overlaps slightly onto the product photo area; shrink it to a smaller corner ribbon or move it fully off the image edge so it never overlaps the parka photo at any viewport width.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
16HighPDP-033 · mobileProduct page

Largest Contentful Paint under 2.5s on mobile

Mobile view. Highlighted area shows what we found.
Mobile view. Highlighted area shows what we found.Product page, second product we sampledPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:39 PMSecond product we sampled: www.eddiebauer.com/products/quilted-bomber-eb000703w

The problem

The main content of the product page takes longer than 2.5 seconds to appear ("Largest Contentful Paint" is slow).

Why it matters

Every extra second of load time drops conversion by ~7% (Google, 2024). 2.5s is Google's threshold for a good experience. Above 4s is considered poor and hurts search rankings too.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
17HighCRT-007 · momentumCart

Line items editable in place (qty, variant, remove) without page reload

Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.
Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:40 PM

The problem

Cart items can't be edited in place: quantity changes or removals are missing or require leaving the cart.

Why it matters

Shoppers adjust quantities at the last moment. If editing is hard, they either abandon or check out with the wrong items and return them later.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
18HighCRT-010 · momentumCart

Primary checkout CTA visually dominant on the page

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:40 PM

The problem

The primary checkout button doesn't visually dominate the cart page. It competes for attention with promo-apply, save-for-later, or continue-shopping controls.

Why it matters

Cart is a decision moment. If the buyer's eye doesn't land on "Checkout" instantly, they scroll around, get distracted by promo hunting, and leave. Making the checkout CTA the biggest, brightest thing on the page measurably lifts completion.

What to do

Differentiate the primary CTA by keeping 'Checkout+' solid black/bold as the main action, but restyle 'CHECKOUT WITHOUT FREE RETURNS' as a smaller, outlined or text-link style button so it clearly reads as a secondary option rather than an equal-weight duplicate.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
19MediumPDP-003 · decisionProduct page

Sticky add-to-cart on long product pages

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PM

The problem

On this long product page, the Add-to-Cart button disappears once the shopper scrolls down. There is no sticky bar that keeps it reachable.

Why it matters

Shoppers scroll deep into reviews and details, decide to buy, and then have to scroll all the way back up. Every extra scroll is a chance to get distracted and leave.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
20MediumPDP-015 · confidenceProduct page

Image zoom available on desktop and mobile

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PM

The problem

Clicking the product image doesn't open a zoom view. Shoppers can't inspect details, fabric, or quality up close.

Why it matters

Zoom is how online shoppers replace touching the product. Baymard finds inadequate image inspection among the top reasons for product-page abandonment.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
21MediumPDP-021 · confidenceProduct page

Q&A section or complete specifications for considered purchases

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PMA chat window was open when we took this picture; the check concerns the page behind it.

The problem

The product page does not have a Q&A section or a real specifications table. Shoppers cannot answer their own questions before buying.

Why it matters

Considered purchases (electronics, appliances, tools, tech gear) live and die on the details page. When shoppers cannot find dimensions, materials, compatibility, or answers to obvious questions, they leave to research on Amazon or a competitor and often buy there instead.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
22MediumPDP-031 · mobileProduct page

Tap targets at least 44x44 px on all interactive elements

Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.
Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pagePhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:38 PM

The problem

Some interactive elements on the mobile page are smaller than 44x44 pixels. Fingers struggle to hit them accurately.

Why it matters

44x44 pixels is the minimum touch target Apple and the WCAG 2.2 guidelines recommend. Below that, mis-taps happen: buyers hit the wrong swatch, wrong quantity, wrong link, and abandon in frustration.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
23MediumCRT-015 · momentumCart

Save-for-later distinct from Remove (recovery preserved)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:40 PM

The problem

The cart only offers a "Remove" action. There is no "Save for later" or "Move to wishlist" option to hold the item without buying today.

Why it matters

A shopper who is not ready to buy today but likes an item will either remove it (and forget) or leave the tab open (and forget). Either way you lose the sale. A save-for-later button captures that intent.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
24MediumCHK-003 · structureCheckout

Clear step indicator showing progress through checkout

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The checkout doesn't show which step the buyer is on or how many steps remain. It feels like an infinite form.

Why it matters

Not knowing how long a task will take is one of the strongest predictors of abandonment. A visible "Step 2 of 3" gives buyers the confidence to push through the next 30 seconds of typing.

What to do

Add a step indicator at the top of the form (e.g., 'Contact → Delivery → Shipping → Payment' breadcrumb below the Eddie Bauer logo) with the current step bolded or highlighted, similar to Shopify's default checkout progress bar, so users know how many steps remain after Contact and Delivery.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
25MediumCHK-010 · formsCheckout

Single Full Name field (not first + last)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The checkout uses separate First Name and Last Name fields instead of a single Full Name field.

Why it matters

Two fields cost two taps and two keyboard focuses on mobile. Baymard research shows a single Full Name field measurably lifts checkout completion, especially on phones.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
26MediumCHK-018 · formsCheckout

Correct HTML input types (email, tel, number) for mobile keyboards

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

Some input fields use `type="text"` when they should use `type="email"`, `type="tel"`, or `inputmode="numeric"`. Mobile keyboards do not adapt.

Why it matters

The wrong keyboard is a small papercut on every entry. Type an email on a phone with a QWERTY (no @ key) or a phone number without the number pad, and completion drops.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
27MediumCHK-019 · formsCheckout

Autocomplete attributes set correctly (given-name, family-name, cc-number, etc.)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

Personal-info fields are missing correct `autocomplete` attributes, or one is set to `autocomplete="off"`. Password managers and browser autofill do not work smoothly.

Why it matters

WCAG 2.2 requires autocomplete on personal-info fields for accessibility. Beyond compliance, correct autocomplete makes checkout a 2-tap experience for returning buyers, huge for mobile conversion.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
28MediumCHK-020 · formsCheckout

Ship-to same as billing offered as default

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The checkout does not offer a "Same as shipping" checkbox for the billing address, with the box checked by default. Buyers have to type their address twice. (This rule only applies to physical-product stores.)

Why it matters

For most orders, billing and shipping addresses are the same. Making the buyer re-enter their address is duplicate work and a common source of typos.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
29MediumCHK-021 · formsCheckout

Phone number field explains why it is needed (or is optional)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The phone number field is required with no explanation why. Buyers who value their privacy hesitate or abandon.

Why it matters

"Why does a t-shirt store need my phone number?" is a real objection. Without a rationale, some shoppers will not give it and will leave.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
30MediumCHK-024 · formsCheckout

Form labels visible above fields (not placeholder-only)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The checkout form uses placeholder-only labels: the field's purpose is shown as grey text inside the input, and disappears the moment the buyer starts typing.

Why it matters

Placeholder-only labels violate WCAG accessibility, but they also just cost sales. A buyer who types a wrong value, then forgets what the field was for, has to erase everything to see the label again. Frustration compounds.

What to do

Add persistent labels (e.g. 'Email', 'First name', 'Last name', 'Address', 'City', 'ZIP code', 'Card number', 'Expiration date', 'CVV') above each input box in a small gray font, similar to how 'Country/Region' currently has a label above the 'United States' dropdown, so the field purpose remains visible once the shopper starts typing.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
31MediumCHK-035 · trustCheckout

Trust/security signals visible near payment step

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The payment step doesn't show any trust or security signals near the payment fields (padlock icon, "Secure checkout", PCI badge, Verified by Visa).

Why it matters

Buyers are at their most anxious when typing card numbers. A visible security signal near the field removes that anxiety and lifts conversion.

What to do

Add a small lock icon with 'Secure checkout' text directly above or beside the 'Discount code or gift card' field and the green 'Verify with ID.me' button, similar to trust badges seen on major retailers, so users see reassurance right where they enter payment/discount info rather than nowhere on the page.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
32MediumCHK-040 · mobileCheckout

Payment form supports mobile browser autofill for card details

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The card-payment form is missing the `autocomplete` attributes mobile browsers need to autofill saved cards.

Why it matters

iOS and Android can autofill a saved card in one tap when the fields are labeled correctly. Without it, the buyer types 16 digits, expiry, and CVV manually, and many abandon.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
33MediumCHK-A04 · agentAI Shoppers

Delegated-payment compatibility signals present (tokenization endpoints)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

The checkout does not declare support for delegated-payment (ACP tokenization). Agents cannot pass a tokenized payment method on the buyer's behalf.

Why it matters

Delegated-payment is the piece that actually lets agents complete a purchase without asking the buyer to type their card. Stripe and PayPal both support this via their ACP modes. Without it, agents can prep the order but hand it back to the buyer to finalize.

Impact
0–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
34LowCHK-042 · mobileCheckout

No layout jumps when form errors appear

Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.
Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:41 PM

The problem

When an error message appears, the form visibly jumps, moving fields under the buyer's cursor or thumb.

Why it matters

Layout jumps cause mis-clicks and lose the buyer's place in the form. On mobile they routinely cause wrong-field input.

Impact
0.1–0.4%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
AI ShoppersHow the store performs for AI shopping agents and AI search

An AI assistant can find Eddiebauer. It cannot complete a purchase there.

UXFix scores every store twice: once for human shoppers, once for the agents now doing the browsing on their behalf. Eddiebauer scores 62 for humans and 58 for agents. The gap is the part most stores have not looked at yet. 4 of the 12 agent rules are not fully met.

AI Shoppers score
58/100
AI search visibility
5of 8

Derived from this store's own captured product-page content. Coverage judges whether that content answers each query — it is not a measurement of search volume or of what any AI currently recommends.

What an agent could read
Price and availability present in DOM as text (not JS/image only)PDP-A02
llms.txt present at root; product URLs not bot-blockedPDP-A03
Canonical URLs stable; variant URLs machine-readable and permanentPDP-A04
Cart state reachable via stable URL or API endpointCRT-A01
No session trap that breaks agent-driven cart hydrationCRT-A02
Cart line items include machine-readable product IDs/GTINsCRT-A03
No CAPTCHA-only gate without accessible agent pathCHK-A02
What it could not
Complete Product schema.org: price, availability, GTIN/SKU, rating, shipping detailsPDP-A01
Machine checkout readiness signals (ACP/UCP endpoints declared)CHK-A01
Delegated-payment compatibility signals present (tokenization endpoints)CHK-A04
Structured errors returned in machine-readable format for agent flowsCHK-A05
AI search results we ran
What's the best men's down parka for extremely cold winter weather?
Covered"Serious warmth for serious cold... packed with premium down insulation for thermal comfort in chilly winter temperatures"
I need a warm parka with a removable fur hood for winter commuting
Covered"adjustable, insulated hood has a removable faux fur ruff"
My winter jacket isn't waterproof, what parka sheds moisture well?
Partial"StormRepel® DWR finish sheds moisture" — no waterproof rating or full weatherproofing claim given
How does the Eddie Bauer Boundary Pass Parka compare to other down parkas like Canada Goose?
MissingNo competitor or comparative product content present
What's a good gift for a tall man who needs a warm winter coat?
Partial"Fit: Regular Tall" size options listed, but no gift-specific framing or messaging
Does Eddie Bauer have tall sizes for men's winter coats?
Covered"Fit: Regular Tall" listed as an option under product variants
What jacket should I buy for below freezing temperatures with an insulated hood?
Covered"adjustable, insulated hood" combined with "premium down insulation for thermal comfort in chilly winter temperatures"
Does Eddie Bauer offer free shipping on orders over $99?
Covered"FREE SHIPPING $99+ | US ONLY"

Questions this audit answers

What is Eddiebauer's UX audit score?

Eddiebauer (eddiebauer.com) scored 62/100 on 8 September 2026 in UXFix's independent audit of its product page, cart and checkout, judged on 95 of the 115 rules run.

What are the biggest UX issues on eddiebauer.com?

The audit found 28 failing checks. The costliest: errors preserve entered data (never clear the form on error), full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry and add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile.

Can AI shopping agents read Eddiebauer's store?

Eddiebauer scores 58/100 on UXFix's AI Shoppers rules, which test whether an AI agent can read price, stock and shipping from the store and complete a purchase there.

How was this audit conducted?

UXFix ran the same 115 deterministic rules it runs on every store: a full purchase walk on desktop and mobile, from product page to payment step, using only the public storefront. No store data or analytics access was used, and every finding is shown with the captured screen.

How does Eddiebauer compare with other audited stores?

Against 28 scored stores in the UXFix benchmark, Eddiebauer ranks 8 with 62/100. The benchmark median is 58. As of 9 September 2026.

Conclusion

Eddiebauer is not a badly built store. It passes 53 of 95 assessable rules. What it has is a band of friction between the product page and the payment step, and every part of it is named above.

The 34 findings above come to roughly 101 developer hours of estimated effort in total. Most are settings or template changes rather than rebuilds. A further 14 rules are only partly met and worth a look after these.

The pattern repeats across the stores we audit: the score is rarely lost on visual design, and it is rarely lost in one place. It is lost on when the cost appears, how many decisions stand between a shopper and paying, and whether a machine can read any of it.

If they fix three things
  1. Errors preserve entered data (never clear the form on error) 4h front-end
  2. Full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry 4h front-end
  3. Add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile 2h front-end
Now
62
Projected
64

Modelled, not measured. We re-audit for free to check.

Get your store audited

The same rules, the same evidence, the same estimates, on your product page, cart and checkout. Free, no card, about two minutes.

Cite or embed this audit

Quote the score with its date, or embed the live badge. The badge links back to this page and stays current if we re-audit.

Citation
UXFix (2026). Eddiebauer UX and conversion audit: 62/100. Audited 8 September 2026. https://uxfix.ai/audits/eddiebauer-com
Embed snippet
<a href="https://uxfix.ai/audits/eddiebauer-com"><img src="https://uxfix.ai/audits/eddiebauer-com/badge.svg" alt="UXFix score: Eddiebauer 62/100" width="220" height="48" /></a>

More case studies

Recent audits from the same benchmark corpus.

Wpfactory
wpfactory.com
70/100
Keenfootwear
keenfootwear.com
56/100
Benetton
benetton.com
58/100

Disclaimer

This is an independent audit. It was not sponsored, commissioned, paid for or reviewed by Eddiebauer, and UXFix has no commercial relationship with the store. Findings were produced from the public storefront on 8 September 2026 and may no longer reflect the live site. Conversion figures are estimates modelled from published abandonment research, not from the store's own analytics. Store name and screens are used for commentary and comparison. If you work at Eddiebauer and would like this page corrected or removed, email [email protected].

Findings reflect eddiebauer.com as captured on 8 September 2026. Stores change; if something here no longer matches the live site, email [email protected] and we will re-check and republish.

All case studiesArticlesPricingRead the full methodology