UXFixUXFix
Language
Audit my store
Kathmandu logo

Kathmandu

kathmandu.com.au

We found 34 issues in Kathmandu's product page, a modelled 12.7–40.9% of conversions.

Audit run by UXFix on 8 September 2026 against 115 rules. Every finding below is shown with the screen we captured, in the order they cost conversions. Nothing here was sponsored or reviewed by the store.

Audit by Abdulhameid Grandoka

Audit date
8 September 2026
Issues found
34
Est. conversion loss
12.7–40.9%
Rules run
115
AI Shoppers score
54/100
Overall checkout score
63/100
FDCBA

Grade C, needs work. Most points are lost on trust and transparency.

Score breakdown by category

Each category is scored 0–100 from the rules that apply to it.

trust
14

Delivery expectation shown before final purchase. Trust/security signals visible near payment step. And 3 more.

transparency
29

Cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate. Shipping estimator (ZIP/country) available in cart. And 2 more.

forms
50

Total form fields 8 or fewer (industry average is 11.3). Address autocomplete (Google/Loqate) present. And 6 more.

decision
59

Price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile. Add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile. And 4 more.

internationalization
67

Currency shown consistent with user region.

How Kathmandu compares

Across 25 audited stores, as of 8 September 2026. Method and full ranking: the UXFix ecommerce benchmark.

This store
63/100
Benchmark median
58/100
Benchmark mean
59/100
Rank
6 of 25

Scores above 79% of audited stores

What we checked

The same rule pass UXFix runs on every store. No store data and no analytics access — everything below was observable from the public storefront.

  1. 1
    A full purchase walk on desktop and mobile

    Product page to payment step, one real product, both viewports.

  2. 2
    Cost transparency at every step

    When shipping, tax and totals first become visible to the shopper.

  3. 3
    Form and field behaviour

    Field count, labels, autofill, error placement, recovery after a failed submit.

  4. 4
    Trust signals where money is entered

    Payment marks, security copy, returns and contact reachability at the pay step.

  5. 5
    Mobile ergonomics

    Tap target sizes, thumb reach, keyboard type, viewport zoom on focus.

  6. 6
    Machine readability

    Whether an AI shopping agent can read price, stock and shipping from the page.

What we could not check: 22 rules could not be judged from the public storefront on the date above. They were dropped from the score, not guessed at.

Results: 51 rules passed, 13 partial, 29 failed

115 rules were run. 22 could not be assessed and were dropped rather than guessed, leaving 93 scored. A further 3 findings are held back from this page because our wording for them was not fit to publish.

51 passing~13 partial29 failing?22 not assessable

What Kathmandu does well

Rules already passing. No action needed on any of these.

  • Price and availability present in DOM as text (not JS/image only)
  • llms.txt present at root; product URLs not bot-blocked
  • Canonical URLs stable; variant URLs machine-readable and permanent
  • Cart state reachable via stable URL or API endpoint
  • No session trap that breaks agent-driven cart hydration

Where it falls short

The issues, in the order they appear below.

  • Price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile0.9–2.3%
  • Cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate0.9–2.3%
  • Full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry0.9–2.3%
  • Add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile0.8–2.1%
  • Shipping estimator (ZIP/country) available in cart0.8–2.1%
  • Tax shown or clearly labeled as calculated at checkout0.8–2.1%
  • Line items editable in place (qty, variant, remove) without page reload0.8–2.1%
  • Total form fields 8 or fewer (industry average is 11.3)0.8–2.1%
Partial, worth a look

Right idea, wrong placement or timing: price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile, cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate and full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry. And 10 more.

The average store scores 38. Where do you land?
Average 38 You ?
Settle it →

Findings: 34 issues, ranked by estimated conversion loss

Each finding shows the screen as we captured it on 8 September 2026, what the problem is, and what it costs in conversions.

01CriticalPDP-001 · decisionProduct page

Price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product page, second product we sampledPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:32 PMSecond product we sampled: www.kathmandu.com.au/products/axon-everyday-backpack-25l-...

The problem

The product price is not visible above the fold on desktop or on mobile. Shoppers have to scroll to find out what the product costs.

Why it matters

Price is the single strongest predictor of whether a shopper stays or bounces. If they can't see it in the first second, they're gone. This is the highest-impact fix on any product page.

Impact
0.9–2.3%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
02CriticalCRT-001 · transparencyCart

Cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The cart does not show a full cost breakdown. Some of subtotal, shipping, tax, or total is missing before checkout.

Why it matters

Baymard research: 48% of shoppers abandon at checkout because of surprise costs. If the cart hides shipping or tax until the final step, you are training buyers to bail.

Impact
0.9–2.3%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
03CriticalCHK-031 · paymentCheckout

Full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry

Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.
Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The full order total (including shipping and tax) isn't visible before the buyer starts entering payment details.

Why it matters

Surprise costs at the payment step are the #1 abandonment trigger in every study. Buyers want the final number before their card leaves the wallet.

Impact
0.9–2.3%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
04HighPDP-002 · decisionProduct page

Add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product page, second product we sampledPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:32 PMSecond product we sampled: www.kathmandu.com.au/products/axon-everyday-backpack-25l-...

The problem

The Add-to-Cart button is not visible above the fold on mobile. Shoppers have to scroll to find how to buy.

Why it matters

On mobile especially, buyers scan the top of the page and decide within seconds. If the primary purchase button isn't in that first view, many will leave before scrolling.

What to do

Close or minimize the 'Out There Rewards' popup by default (or make its close X larger and more prominent) and move the 'Add to Bag' button up so it appears within the first viewport, e.g. immediately below the price/member offer text near the bottom of the visible screenshot.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
05HighCRT-002 · transparencyCart

Shipping estimator (ZIP/country) available in cart

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The cart has no shipping estimator; shoppers can't preview shipping costs without starting checkout.

Why it matters

Unknown shipping costs are the single biggest cause of cart abandonment. An estimator answers the question before it becomes a reason to leave.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
06HighCRT-003 · transparencyCart

Tax shown or clearly labeled as calculated at checkout

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The cart does not clearly show tax, either as an amount or as a note that tax will be calculated at checkout.

Why it matters

Buyers in the US and Canada expect a tax line before they commit. Silence at the cart step means a jump in the total at checkout, and that jump is what makes them abandon.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
07HighCRT-007 · momentumCart

Line items editable in place (qty, variant, remove) without page reload

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

Cart items can't be edited in place: quantity changes or removals are missing or require leaving the cart.

Why it matters

Shoppers adjust quantities at the last moment. If editing is hard, they either abandon or check out with the wrong items and return them later.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
08HighCHK-009 · formsCheckout

Total form fields 8 or fewer (industry average is 11.3)

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The checkout has more than 8 form fields. Industry-best checkouts collect 6-8 fields; industry-average is 11.3.

Why it matters

Every extra field drops conversion by roughly 2%. Fields cost you money in a direct, measurable way. A checkout with 13 fields loses ~10% of buyers compared to one with 8.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
09HighCHK-012 · formsCheckout

Address autocomplete (Google/Loqate) present

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The checkout has no address autocomplete (Google Places, Loqate, SmartyStreets, or similar). Shoppers type every line of their address manually.

Why it matters

Address autocomplete cuts address-entry time roughly in half on mobile and drops delivery-failure rates from typos. It also feels premium, buyers notice.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
10HighCHK-038 · trustCheckout

Delivery expectation shown before final purchase

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The checkout page does not show when the order will arrive. Buyers commit to buying without knowing the delivery date.

Why it matters

Delivery timing is often the deciding factor between two stores. If your competitor tells the buyer "arrives Tuesday" and you say nothing, you lose. Especially for gifts.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
11HighPDP-A01 · agentAI Shoppers

Complete Product schema.org: price, availability, GTIN/SKU, rating, shipping details

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:31 PM

The problem

The structured product data that AI shopping agents read (ChatGPT, Google, Copilot) is incomplete on this page. Some or all of these are missing: product ID (GTIN), brand, review data, availability, shipping details.

Why it matters

AI-referred traffic converts 42% higher than regular traffic (Adobe, 2026). But agents only recommend stores whose product data they can read. Incomplete data means invisible to AI shoppers.

Impact
0–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
12HighCHK-A01 · agentAI Shoppers

Machine checkout readiness signals (ACP/UCP endpoints declared)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The checkout has no signals declaring it can be driven by AI agents. No ACP or UCP meta tags, no /.well-known/agentic-commerce endpoint, no Stripe ACP integration.

Why it matters

OpenAI's Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP) and Google's Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) are the emerging standards for agent-driven checkout. Stores that declare readiness get preferential routing from ChatGPT and Google AI. This is 2026's biggest new distribution channel.

Impact
0–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
13HighPDP-018 · confidenceProduct page

Reviews present with summary rating visible above fold

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:31 PM

The problem

The product page shows no star rating or review summary above the fold. Shoppers have to scroll to find social proof.

Why it matters

Ratings are the fastest trust signal on a product page. A shopper who lands and doesn't see any social proof in the first view assumes it's a low-quality product or a new store.

What to do

Since there are 0 reviews, replace the empty star row with a subtle 'Be the first to review' link/button near the price to prompt engagement instead of showing an unfilled star rating that looks like a missing feature.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
14HighPDP-029 · frictionProduct page

No aggressive popup covering PDP within first 10 seconds

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product page, second product we sampledDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:32 PMSecond product we sampled: www.kathmandu.com.au/products/axon-everyday-backpack-25l-...

The problem

An aggressive popup (newsletter, discount, chat prompt) covers this product page shortly after it loads. Cookie banners don't count; this is the newsletter-style overlay.

Why it matters

Popups on first visit interrupt intent. First-time shoppers are still evaluating; a modal that blocks the price or ATC is a fast way to lose them.

What to do

The circular '10% Off*' badge overlapping the bottom-left of the product photo has a close (X) icon but is still partially obscuring the backpack image; move it below the image gallery or into the promo banner area so it doesn't crop the product shot, and ensure the X button is easily tappable on mobile.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
15HighPDP-033 · mobileProduct page

Largest Contentful Paint under 2.5s on mobile

Mobile view. Highlighted area shows what we found.
Mobile view. Highlighted area shows what we found.Product pagePhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:31 PM

The problem

The main content of the product page takes longer than 2.5 seconds to appear ("Largest Contentful Paint" is slow).

Why it matters

Every extra second of load time drops conversion by ~7% (Google, 2024). 2.5s is Google's threshold for a good experience. Above 4s is considered poor and hurts search rankings too.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
16MediumPDP-003 · decisionProduct page

Sticky add-to-cart on long product pages

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:31 PM

The problem

On this long product page, the Add-to-Cart button disappears once the shopper scrolls down. There is no sticky bar that keeps it reachable.

Why it matters

Shoppers scroll deep into reviews and details, decide to buy, and then have to scroll all the way back up. Every extra scroll is a chance to get distracted and leave.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
17MediumPDP-016 · confidenceProduct page

In-scale/lifestyle image included (product in real context)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product page, second product we sampledDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:32 PMSecond product we sampled: www.kathmandu.com.au/products/axon-everyday-backpack-25l-...

The problem

The product gallery only shows the product isolated on a white background. No lifestyle, in-use, or scale reference images.

Why it matters

White-background photos are neutral but not persuasive. Lifestyle images (worn, used, in a real setting) lift conversion 30-50% and cut returns because buyers understand the product better.

What to do

Add at least one lifestyle photo showing the Axon Everyday Backpack worn on a person's back (e.g. commuting or at a desk) alongside the current white-background shot at top-left to give shoppers a sense of scale and real-world use.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
18MediumPDP-031 · mobileProduct page

Tap targets at least 44x44 px on all interactive elements

Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.
Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pagePhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:31 PM

The problem

Some interactive elements on the mobile page are smaller than 44x44 pixels. Fingers struggle to hit them accurately.

Why it matters

44x44 pixels is the minimum touch target Apple and the WCAG 2.2 guidelines recommend. Below that, mis-taps happen: buyers hit the wrong swatch, wrong quantity, wrong link, and abandon in frustration.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
19MediumCRT-005 · transparencyCart

Delivery estimate for each item visible in cart

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The cart does not show a delivery estimate for each item. Buyers cannot see when their order will arrive.

Why it matters

Delivery timing is the second-biggest factor after price, especially for gifts and urgent purchases. Uncertain arrival dates push buyers to competitors who are clear.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
20MediumCHK-003 · structureCheckout

Clear step indicator showing progress through checkout

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The checkout doesn't show which step the buyer is on or how many steps remain. It feels like an infinite form.

Why it matters

Not knowing how long a task will take is one of the strongest predictors of abandonment. A visible "Step 2 of 3" gives buyers the confidence to push through the next 30 seconds of typing.

What to do

Add a step indicator above the 'Express checkout' section, e.g. 'Information → Shipping → Payment' with the current step (Information) bolded or underlined in the same green accent used for 'Sign in', so users know how many steps remain.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
21MediumCHK-007 · structureCheckout

Site logo/name does not link away from checkout (or warns first)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The store logo in the checkout header links straight back to the homepage.

Why it matters

A stray click on the logo dumps the buyer out of checkout, and on some stores it also loses the form data. Small leak, easy fix.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
22MediumCHK-010 · formsCheckout

Single Full Name field (not first + last)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The checkout uses separate First Name and Last Name fields instead of a single Full Name field.

Why it matters

Two fields cost two taps and two keyboard focuses on mobile. Baymard research shows a single Full Name field measurably lifts checkout completion, especially on phones.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
23MediumCHK-018 · formsCheckout

Correct HTML input types (email, tel, number) for mobile keyboards

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

Some input fields use `type="text"` when they should use `type="email"`, `type="tel"`, or `inputmode="numeric"`. Mobile keyboards do not adapt.

Why it matters

The wrong keyboard is a small papercut on every entry. Type an email on a phone with a QWERTY (no @ key) or a phone number without the number pad, and completion drops.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
24MediumCHK-019 · formsCheckout

Autocomplete attributes set correctly (given-name, family-name, cc-number, etc.)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

Personal-info fields are missing correct `autocomplete` attributes, or one is set to `autocomplete="off"`. Password managers and browser autofill do not work smoothly.

Why it matters

WCAG 2.2 requires autocomplete on personal-info fields for accessibility. Beyond compliance, correct autocomplete makes checkout a 2-tap experience for returning buyers, huge for mobile conversion.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
25MediumCHK-020 · formsCheckout

Ship-to same as billing offered as default

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The checkout does not offer a "Same as shipping" checkbox for the billing address, with the box checked by default. Buyers have to type their address twice. (This rule only applies to physical-product stores.)

Why it matters

For most orders, billing and shipping addresses are the same. Making the buyer re-enter their address is duplicate work and a common source of typos.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
26MediumCHK-021 · formsCheckout

Phone number field explains why it is needed (or is optional)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The phone number field is required with no explanation why. Buyers who value their privacy hesitate or abandon.

Why it matters

"Why does a t-shirt store need my phone number?" is a real objection. Without a rationale, some shoppers will not give it and will leave.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
27MediumCHK-024 · formsCheckout

Form labels visible above fields (not placeholder-only)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The checkout form uses placeholder-only labels: the field's purpose is shown as grey text inside the input, and disappears the moment the buyer starts typing.

Why it matters

Placeholder-only labels violate WCAG accessibility, but they also just cost sales. A buyer who types a wrong value, then forgets what the field was for, has to erase everything to see the label again. Frustration compounds.

What to do

Add small persistent labels (e.g. 'First name', 'Last name') above each input like 'Country/Region' and 'Shipping method' already do, so labels like 'Street address' and 'Suburb' remain visible once the user starts typing instead of disappearing placeholder text.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
28MediumCHK-035 · trustCheckout

Trust/security signals visible near payment step

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The payment step doesn't show any trust or security signals near the payment fields (padlock icon, "Secure checkout", PCI badge, Verified by Visa).

Why it matters

Buyers are at their most anxious when typing card numbers. A visible security signal near the field removes that anxiety and lifts conversion.

What to do

Add a small padlock icon with 'Secure checkout' text near the Express checkout buttons (Shop/PayPal) or above the Contact email field, and place a row of PCI/SSL trust badges near the Discount code and Apply gift card section on the right panel to reassure users before they enter payment details.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
29MediumCHK-036 · trustCheckout

Contact/help option accessible during checkout (phone, chat)

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

There's no visible way to reach help from the checkout page: no phone number, no chat widget, no "Need help?" link.

Why it matters

When something goes wrong mid-checkout (a declined card, a missing address field), a visible help option is the difference between recovery and abandonment.

What to do

Add a persistent help affordance near the Kathmandu logo in the top header, e.g. a 'Need help? Contact us' link or a live chat bubble in the bottom-right corner, so shoppers stuck on fields like Phone or Payment can get support without leaving checkout.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
30MediumCHK-037 · trustCheckout

Return policy visible or linked in checkout footer

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The checkout page doesn't link the returns / refund policy. Shoppers who want to check before buying can't find it.

Why it matters

First-time buyers often confirm the return policy in the moments before they pay. A quick link removes the last barrier without pulling them out of checkout.

What to do

Add a 'Returns Policy' or 'Refund Policy' link next to the existing 'Privacy statement' and 'Cookie Preferences' links at the bottom-left footer area, using the same underlined text style, so shoppers can verify return terms before paying.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
31MediumCHK-A04 · agentAI Shoppers

Delegated-payment compatibility signals present (tokenization endpoints)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

The checkout does not declare support for delegated-payment (ACP tokenization). Agents cannot pass a tokenized payment method on the buyer's behalf.

Why it matters

Delegated-payment is the piece that actually lets agents complete a purchase without asking the buyer to type their card. Stripe and PayPal both support this via their ACP modes. Without it, agents can prep the order but hand it back to the buyer to finalize.

Impact
0–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
32LowPDP-013 · decisionProduct page

Quantity selector present and easy to use (tap-friendly on mobile)

Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.
Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pagePhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:31 PMWe could not point at the exact spot on this page.

The problem

The quantity selector on this product page is either missing on mobile, or too small to tap comfortably.

Why it matters

Fat-finger errors turn quick purchases into frustrating ones. Apple's tap-target guideline is 44px minimum; anything smaller mistaps often on real thumbs.

What to do

Add a quantity stepper (with visibly large - / + buttons, at least 44px tall) directly above or beside the black 'Add to bag' button, similar in style to the Colour swatch row, so users can select quantity before purchase.

Impact
0.1–0.4%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
33LowCRT-A03 · agentAI Shoppers

Cart line items include machine-readable product IDs/GTINs

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

Cart line items do not include machine-readable product identifiers (SKU, GTIN, product_id). Agents see only display names.

Why it matters

Without a stable identifier per line, agents cannot cross-check items against a catalog, apply price rules, or reconcile the order. Display names change with translation and localization, they are not safe identifiers.

Impact
0–0.4%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
34LowCHK-042 · mobileCheckout

No layout jumps when form errors appear

Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.
Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 9:33 PM

The problem

When an error message appears, the form visibly jumps, moving fields under the buyer's cursor or thumb.

Why it matters

Layout jumps cause mis-clicks and lose the buyer's place in the form. On mobile they routinely cause wrong-field input.

Impact
0.1–0.4%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
AI ShoppersHow the store performs for AI shopping agents and AI search

An AI assistant can find Kathmandu. It cannot complete a purchase there.

UXFix scores every store twice: once for human shoppers, once for the agents now doing the browsing on their behalf. Kathmandu scores 63 for humans and 54 for agents. The gap is the part most stores have not looked at yet. 5 of the 12 agent rules are not fully met.

AI Shoppers score
54/100
AI search visibility
3of 8

Derived from this store's own captured product-page content. Coverage judges whether that content answers each query — it is not a measurement of search volume or of what any AI currently recommends.

What an agent could read
Price and availability present in DOM as text (not JS/image only)PDP-A02
llms.txt present at root; product URLs not bot-blockedPDP-A03
Canonical URLs stable; variant URLs machine-readable and permanentPDP-A04
Cart state reachable via stable URL or API endpointCRT-A01
No session trap that breaks agent-driven cart hydrationCRT-A02
No CAPTCHA-only gate without accessible agent pathCHK-A02
What it could not
Complete Product schema.org: price, availability, GTIN/SKU, rating, shipping detailsPDP-A01
Machine checkout readiness signals (ACP/UCP endpoints declared)CHK-A01
Delegated-payment compatibility signals present (tokenization endpoints)CHK-A04
Structured errors returned in machine-readable format for agent flowsCHK-A05
Cart line items include machine-readable product IDs/GTINsCRT-A03
AI search results we ran
best UPF50+ sun hat for kids
CoveredKids' Trailhead UPF50+ Sun Hat - Light Steel Blue; 'provides UPF 50+ protection through its clever fabric construction'
what hat protects my child's neck from sun while playing outside
Covered'neck shield, so your child can maximise playtime outside'
where can I buy kids' sun protection clothing in Australia
CoveredBreadcrumb 'UPF Clothing' under Kids > Clothing, site is 'Kathmandu Australia'
best hats for kids hiking in the sun
PartialHat description mentions 'sunny days' and 'outside' but no hiking-specific claim
gift ideas for a kid who loves outdoor adventures
PartialKids' category and 'mini adventurers' phrase exist but no gift-specific framing
Kathmandu sun hats vs Salomon or Keen sun protection gear
MissingBrands Salomon, Keen listed in nav but no comparative content on sun hats
what size sun hat should I buy for my toddler vs older kid
MissingNo sizing/age range details present in title, meta, or visible text
is Kathmandu a sustainable/ethical brand for kids' outdoor wear
PartialNav includes 'Certified B Corp', 'Our Impact', 'Social Impact Policies' but not linked to this product

Questions this audit answers

What is Kathmandu's UX audit score?

Kathmandu (kathmandu.com.au) scored 63/100 on 8 September 2026 in UXFix's independent audit of its product page, cart and checkout, judged on 93 of the 115 rules run.

What are the biggest UX issues on kathmandu.com.au?

The audit found 29 failing checks. The costliest: price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile, cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate and full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry.

Can AI shopping agents read Kathmandu's store?

Kathmandu scores 54/100 on UXFix's AI Shoppers rules, which test whether an AI agent can read price, stock and shipping from the store and complete a purchase there.

How was this audit conducted?

UXFix ran the same 115 deterministic rules it runs on every store: a full purchase walk on desktop and mobile, from product page to payment step, using only the public storefront. No store data or analytics access was used, and every finding is shown with the captured screen.

How does Kathmandu compare with other audited stores?

Against 25 scored stores in the UXFix benchmark, Kathmandu ranks 6 with 63/100. The benchmark median is 58. As of 8 September 2026.

Conclusion

Kathmandu is not a badly built store. It passes 51 of 93 assessable rules. What it has is a band of friction between the product page and the payment step, and every part of it is named above.

The 34 findings above come to roughly 95 developer hours of estimated effort in total. Most are settings or template changes rather than rebuilds. A further 13 rules are only partly met and worth a look after these.

The pattern repeats across the stores we audit: the score is rarely lost on visual design, and it is rarely lost in one place. It is lost on when the cost appears, how many decisions stand between a shopper and paying, and whether a machine can read any of it.

If they fix three things
  1. Price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile 2h front-end
  2. Cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate 2h front-end
  3. Full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry 4h front-end
Now
63
Projected
62

Modelled, not measured. We re-audit for free to check.

Get your store audited

The same rules, the same evidence, the same estimates, on your product page, cart and checkout. Free, no card, about two minutes.

Cite or embed this audit

Quote the score with its date, or embed the live badge. The badge links back to this page and stays current if we re-audit.

Citation
UXFix (2026). Kathmandu UX and conversion audit: 63/100. Audited 8 September 2026. https://uxfix.ai/audits/kathmandu-com-au
Embed snippet
<a href="https://uxfix.ai/audits/kathmandu-com-au"><img src="https://uxfix.ai/audits/kathmandu-com-au/badge.svg" alt="UXFix score: Kathmandu 63/100" width="220" height="48" /></a>

More case studies

Recent audits from the same benchmark corpus.

Wpfactory
wpfactory.com
70/100
Boden
boden.com
64/100
Toms
toms.com
52/100

Disclaimer

This is an independent audit. It was not sponsored, commissioned, paid for or reviewed by Kathmandu, and UXFix has no commercial relationship with the store. Findings were produced from the public storefront on 8 September 2026 and may no longer reflect the live site. Conversion figures are estimates modelled from published abandonment research, not from the store's own analytics. Store name and screens are used for commentary and comparison. If you work at Kathmandu and would like this page corrected or removed, email [email protected].

Findings reflect kathmandu.com.au as captured on 8 September 2026. Stores change; if something here no longer matches the live site, email [email protected] and we will re-check and republish.

All case studiesArticlesPricingRead the full methodology