UXFixUXFix
Language
Audit my store
Gymshark logo

Gymshark

gymshark.com

We found 41 issues in Gymshark's checkout, a modelled 16.7–52.9% of conversions.

Audit run by UXFix on 8 September 2026 against 115 rules. Every finding below is shown with the screen we captured, in the order they cost conversions. Nothing here was sponsored or reviewed by the store.

Audit by Abdulhameid Grandoka

Audit date
8 September 2026
Issues found
41
Est. conversion loss
16.7–52.9%
Rules run
115
AI Shoppers score
33/100
Overall checkout score
57/100
FDCBA

Grade C, needs work. Most points are lost on forms and trust.

Score breakdown by category

Each category is scored 0–100 from the rules that apply to it.

forms
39

Errors preserve entered data (never clear the form on error). Total form fields 8 or fewer (industry average is 11.3). And 7 more.

trust
39

Delivery expectation shown before final purchase. Trust/security signals visible near payment step. And 1 more.

transparency
42

Cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate. Tax shown or clearly labeled as calculated at checkout. And 1 more.

decision
44

Price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile. Add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile. And 5 more.

mobile
56

Tap targets at least 44x44 px on all interactive elements. Variant picker usable on small screens without accidental taps. And 3 more.

How Gymshark compares

Across 20 audited stores, as of 8 September 2026. Method and full ranking: the UXFix ecommerce benchmark.

This store
57/100
Benchmark median
59/100
Benchmark mean
59.7/100
Rank
12 of 20

Scores above 42% of audited stores

What we checked

The same rule pass UXFix runs on every store. No store data and no analytics access — everything below was observable from the public storefront.

  1. 1
    A full purchase walk on desktop and mobile

    Product page to payment step, one real product, both viewports.

  2. 2
    Cost transparency at every step

    When shipping, tax and totals first become visible to the shopper.

  3. 3
    Form and field behaviour

    Field count, labels, autofill, error placement, recovery after a failed submit.

  4. 4
    Trust signals where money is entered

    Payment marks, security copy, returns and contact reachability at the pay step.

  5. 5
    Mobile ergonomics

    Tap target sizes, thumb reach, keyboard type, viewport zoom on focus.

  6. 6
    Machine readability

    Whether an AI shopping agent can read price, stock and shipping from the page.

What we could not check: 24 rules could not be judged from the public storefront on the date above. They were dropped from the score, not guessed at.

Results: 42 rules passed, 12 partial, 37 failed

115 rules were run. 24 could not be assessed and were dropped rather than guessed, leaving 91 scored. A further 3 findings are held back from this page because our wording for them was not fit to publish.

42 passing~12 partial37 failing?24 not assessable

What Gymshark does well

Rules already passing. No action needed on any of these.

  • Price and availability present in DOM as text (not JS/image only)
  • No CAPTCHA-only gate without accessible agent path
  • Guest checkout offered as first-class option (no account wall)
  • Checkout completes in 5 steps or fewer (or one-page equivalent)
  • Cart contents and total visible throughout checkout

Where it falls short

The issues, in the order they appear below.

  • Errors preserve entered data (never clear the form on error)2–5.2%
  • Price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile0.9–2.3%
  • Cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate0.9–2.3%
  • Full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry0.9–2.3%
  • Add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile0.8–2.1%
  • Delivery/arrival date estimate shown0.8–2.1%
  • Variant selection: unavailable combos disabled, not error-on-click0.8–2.1%
  • No aggressive popup covering PDP within first 10 seconds0.8–2.1%
Partial, worth a look

Right idea, wrong placement or timing: price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile, cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate and full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry. And 9 more.

AI Shoppers
AI shopping agents already visit your store. Can they buy?
Scored against agent-commerce specs · 0–100
Test agent readiness →

Findings: 41 issues, ranked by estimated conversion loss

Each finding shows the screen as we captured it on 8 September 2026, what the problem is, and what it costs in conversions.

01CriticalCHK-016 · formsCheckout

Errors preserve entered data (never clear the form on error)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

When the checkout form has an error, the store clears out information the shopper already typed correctly.

Why it matters

A shopper who typed their address once and lost it to a form error frequently will not type it twice. This is a critical-severity leak at the very end of the funnel, where every lost buyer was seconds from paying.

Impact
2–5.2%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
02CriticalPDP-001 · decisionProduct page

Price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile

Mobile view (only what shoppers see before scrolling). Highlighted area shows what we found.
Mobile view (only what shoppers see before scrolling). Highlighted area shows what we found.Product pagePhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PMWe could not point at the exact spot on this page.

The problem

The product price is not visible above the fold on desktop or on mobile. Shoppers have to scroll to find out what the product costs.

Why it matters

Price is the single strongest predictor of whether a shopper stays or bounces. If they can't see it in the first second, they're gone. This is the highest-impact fix on any product page.

Impact
0.9–2.3%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
03CriticalCRT-001 · transparencyCart

Cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:09 PM

The problem

The cart does not show a full cost breakdown. Some of subtotal, shipping, tax, or total is missing before checkout.

Why it matters

Baymard research: 48% of shoppers abandon at checkout because of surprise costs. If the cart hides shipping or tax until the final step, you are training buyers to bail.

Impact
0.9–2.3%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
04CriticalCHK-031 · paymentCheckout

Full total including shipping and tax visible before payment entry

Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.
Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The full order total (including shipping and tax) isn't visible before the buyer starts entering payment details.

Why it matters

Surprise costs at the payment step are the #1 abandonment trigger in every study. Buyers want the final number before their card leaves the wallet.

Impact
0.9–2.3%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
05HighPDP-002 · decisionProduct page

Add-to-cart CTA above the fold on mobile

Mobile view (only what shoppers see before scrolling). This is where the fix belongs.
Mobile view (only what shoppers see before scrolling). This is where the fix belongs.Product pagePhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PMWe could not point at the exact spot on this page.

The problem

The Add-to-Cart button is not visible above the fold on mobile. Shoppers have to scroll to find how to buy.

Why it matters

On mobile especially, buyers scan the top of the page and decide within seconds. If the primary purchase button isn't in that first view, many will leave before scrolling.

What to do

Dismiss or resolve the 'Cookies' modal and the 'ARE YOU IN THE RIGHT PLACE?' region popup before the product content and 'Add to Bag' button can be reached; consider combining these into a single lightweight consent bar so shoppers can see the product and purchase CTA immediately.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
06HighPDP-005 · decisionProduct page

Delivery/arrival date estimate shown

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PM

The problem

The product page doesn't tell shoppers when their order will arrive. There is no delivery date or lead-time estimate.

Why it matters

Buyers often decide between two stores based on delivery timing, especially for gifts and urgent purchases. Uncertain timing pushes them to competitors who are clear.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
07HighPDP-008 · decisionProduct page

Variant selection: unavailable combos disabled, not error-on-click

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PM

The problem

When a size or color is unavailable, the option still looks selectable. Shoppers only find out it cannot be bought when the add-to-cart step rejects them.

Why it matters

Letting someone pick an option and then failing them is one of the most frustrating patterns in variant selection. It reads as a broken store, and many shoppers leave rather than retry.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
08HighPDP-029 · frictionProduct page

No aggressive popup covering PDP within first 10 seconds

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PMA cookie banner (or chat window) was open when we took this picture; the check concerns the page behind it.

The problem

An aggressive popup (newsletter, discount, chat prompt) covers this product page shortly after it loads. Cookie banners don't count; this is the newsletter-style overlay.

Why it matters

Popups on first visit interrupt intent. First-time shoppers are still evaluating; a modal that blocks the price or ATC is a fast way to lose them.

What to do

Reduce the FR/US country popup to a small dismissible corner banner or auto-detect locale silently, and ensure the size grid and black 'Add to Bag' button remain fully visible and clickable without requiring the shopper to close an overlay first.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
09HighCRT-003 · transparencyCart

Tax shown or clearly labeled as calculated at checkout

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:09 PM

The problem

The cart does not clearly show tax, either as an amount or as a note that tax will be calculated at checkout.

Why it matters

Buyers in the US and Canada expect a tax line before they commit. Silence at the cart step means a jump in the total at checkout, and that jump is what makes them abandon.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
10HighCRT-010 · momentumCart

Primary checkout CTA visually dominant on the page

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:09 PM

The problem

The primary checkout button doesn't visually dominate the cart page. It competes for attention with promo-apply, save-for-later, or continue-shopping controls.

Why it matters

Cart is a decision moment. If the buyer's eye doesn't land on "Checkout" instantly, they scroll around, get distracted by promo hunting, and leave. Making the checkout CTA the biggest, brightest thing on the page measurably lifts completion.

What to do

Dismiss or reposition the 'ARE YOU IN THE RIGHT PLACE?' modal so it doesn't cover the primary checkout button, and ensure the checkout button uses a bold, high-contrast color (e.g. Gymshark's black/blue) larger than the FR/US selector buttons so it remains the clear focal point once the modal closes.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
11HighCHK-009 · formsCheckout

Total form fields 8 or fewer (industry average is 11.3)

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The checkout has more than 8 form fields. Industry-best checkouts collect 6-8 fields; industry-average is 11.3.

Why it matters

Every extra field drops conversion by roughly 2%. Fields cost you money in a direct, measurable way. A checkout with 13 fields loses ~10% of buyers compared to one with 8.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
12HighCHK-012 · formsCheckout

Address autocomplete (Google/Loqate) present

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The checkout has no address autocomplete (Google Places, Loqate, SmartyStreets, or similar). Shoppers type every line of their address manually.

Why it matters

Address autocomplete cuts address-entry time roughly in half on mobile and drops delivery-failure rates from typos. It also feels premium, buyers notice.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
13HighCHK-038 · trustCheckout

Delivery expectation shown before final purchase

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The checkout page does not show when the order will arrive. Buyers commit to buying without knowing the delivery date.

Why it matters

Delivery timing is often the deciding factor between two stores. If your competitor tells the buyer "arrives Tuesday" and you say nothing, you lose. Especially for gifts.

Impact
0.8–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
14HighPDP-A01 · agentAI Shoppers

Complete Product schema.org: price, availability, GTIN/SKU, rating, shipping details

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PM

The problem

The structured product data that AI shopping agents read (ChatGPT, Google, Copilot) is incomplete on this page. Some or all of these are missing: product ID (GTIN), brand, review data, availability, shipping details.

Why it matters

AI-referred traffic converts 42% higher than regular traffic (Adobe, 2026). But agents only recommend stores whose product data they can read. Incomplete data means invisible to AI shoppers.

Impact
0–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
15HighCHK-A01 · agentAI Shoppers

Machine checkout readiness signals (ACP/UCP endpoints declared)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The checkout has no signals declaring it can be driven by AI agents. No ACP or UCP meta tags, no /.well-known/agentic-commerce endpoint, no Stripe ACP integration.

Why it matters

OpenAI's Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP) and Google's Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) are the emerging standards for agent-driven checkout. Stores that declare readiness get preferential routing from ChatGPT and Google AI. This is 2026's biggest new distribution channel.

Impact
0–2.1%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
16HighPDP-022 · confidenceProduct page

Returns/exchange policy visible on PDP (not buried in footer)

Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.
Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.Product page, second product we sampledDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PMSecond product we sampled: www.gymshark.com/products/gymshark-everyday-seamless-long...

The problem

There's no returns or exchange policy communicated on the product page itself. Shoppers have to hunt the footer or FAQ to find it.

Why it matters

"What if I don't like it?" is the last question in every purchase. If the answer isn't obvious, hesitation kills conversion, especially for higher-price items and apparel.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
17HighCRT-007 · momentumCart

Line items editable in place (qty, variant, remove) without page reload

Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.
Desktop view. Highlighted area shows what we found.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:09 PM

The problem

Cart items can't be edited in place: quantity changes or removals are missing or require leaving the cart.

Why it matters

Shoppers adjust quantities at the last moment. If editing is hard, they either abandon or check out with the wrong items and return them later.

Impact
0.4–0.9%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
18MediumPDP-009 · decisionProduct page

Selected variant state unambiguous (visual + text confirmation)

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pagePhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PM

The problem

When a shopper selects a variant (size, color, style, or edition), the selected state isn't clearly indicated with both a visual highlight AND a text label.

Why it matters

Ambiguity here causes wrong-variant orders. The shopper thought they picked Large, actually picked Medium, and it costs you a return plus a lost repeat customer.

What to do

Add a clear selected-state to the size grid (e.g. filled black background with white text for the chosen size like 'M (8-8)') and display confirming text such as 'Size: M' near the 'Select a size' label so users can verify their choice before checkout.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
19MediumPDP-015 · confidenceProduct page

Image zoom available on desktop and mobile

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PM

The problem

Clicking the product image doesn't open a zoom view. Shoppers can't inspect details, fabric, or quality up close.

Why it matters

Zoom is how online shoppers replace touching the product. Baymard finds inadequate image inspection among the top reasons for product-page abandonment.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
20MediumPDP-021 · confidenceProduct page

Q&A section or complete specifications for considered purchases

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Product pageDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PM

The problem

The product page does not have a Q&A section or a real specifications table. Shoppers cannot answer their own questions before buying.

Why it matters

Considered purchases (electronics, appliances, tools, tech gear) live and die on the details page. When shoppers cannot find dimensions, materials, compatibility, or answers to obvious questions, they leave to research on Amazon or a competitor and often buy there instead.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
21MediumPDP-031 · mobileProduct page

Tap targets at least 44x44 px on all interactive elements

Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.
Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.Product pagePhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PM

The problem

Some interactive elements on the mobile page are smaller than 44x44 pixels. Fingers struggle to hit them accurately.

Why it matters

44x44 pixels is the minimum touch target Apple and the WCAG 2.2 guidelines recommend. Below that, mis-taps happen: buyers hit the wrong swatch, wrong quantity, wrong link, and abandon in frustration.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
22MediumPDP-034 · mobileProduct page

Variant picker usable on small screens without accidental taps

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product page, second product we sampledPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PMSecond product we sampled: www.gymshark.com/products/gymshark-everyday-seamless-long...

The problem

The variant picker on mobile has options that are too small or too close together. Fingers hit the wrong option.

Why it matters

Every mistap on a variant is either an abandoned cart or a wrong-order return. On mobile, this is one of the top sources of hidden lost revenue.

What to do

Increase each of the 7 crop-top thumbnail swatches to at least 48x48px and add 8-10px spacing between them, or reduce the number shown per row to 5 with horizontal scroll to prevent accidental taps between similar dark-colored variants.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
23MediumCRT-006 · transparencyCart

Discount/promo application shows explicit line item, not silent adjustment

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:09 PM

The problem

A discount has been applied but there is no explicit line showing the discount amount and label. The saving happens silently.

Why it matters

Buyers who applied a code want to see it working. A silent adjustment feels like the code did not work, and they may re-apply, try a different code, or abandon in frustration.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
24MediumCRT-012 · momentumCart

Express wallets do not visually compete with primary checkout CTA

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:09 PM

The problem

Express wallet buttons (Apple Pay, Google Pay, Shop Pay, PayPal) are competing with the main Checkout button for the shopper's eye.

Why it matters

When every button looks equally important, the shopper hesitates. A clear primary CTA carries momentum through the cart into checkout.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
25MediumCHK-003 · structureCheckout

Clear step indicator showing progress through checkout

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The checkout doesn't show which step the buyer is on or how many steps remain. It feels like an infinite form.

Why it matters

Not knowing how long a task will take is one of the strongest predictors of abandonment. A visible "Step 2 of 3" gives buyers the confidence to push through the next 30 seconds of typing.

What to do

Add a horizontal progress bar above the 'Express checkout' section (e.g. 'Information → Shipping → Payment') with the current step bolded/highlighted in black to match the Gymshark logo styling, so users know how many steps remain before payment.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
26MediumCHK-005 · structureCheckout

Ability to edit cart from within checkout without losing progress

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

There's no way to edit the cart from inside the checkout; fixing a quantity means abandoning the checkout flow.

Why it matters

Buyers often spot a mistake at the order summary. If fixing it costs their progress, some just quit.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
27MediumCHK-007 · structureCheckout

Site logo/name does not link away from checkout (or warns first)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The store logo in the checkout header links straight back to the homepage.

Why it matters

A stray click on the logo dumps the buyer out of checkout, and on some stores it also loses the form data. Small leak, easy fix.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
28MediumCHK-010 · formsCheckout

Single Full Name field (not first + last)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The checkout uses separate First Name and Last Name fields instead of a single Full Name field.

Why it matters

Two fields cost two taps and two keyboard focuses on mobile. Baymard research shows a single Full Name field measurably lifts checkout completion, especially on phones.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
29MediumCHK-018 · formsCheckout

Correct HTML input types (email, tel, number) for mobile keyboards

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

Some input fields use `type="text"` when they should use `type="email"`, `type="tel"`, or `inputmode="numeric"`. Mobile keyboards do not adapt.

Why it matters

The wrong keyboard is a small papercut on every entry. Type an email on a phone with a QWERTY (no @ key) or a phone number without the number pad, and completion drops.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
30MediumCHK-019 · formsCheckout

Autocomplete attributes set correctly (given-name, family-name, cc-number, etc.)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

Personal-info fields are missing correct `autocomplete` attributes, or one is set to `autocomplete="off"`. Password managers and browser autofill do not work smoothly.

Why it matters

WCAG 2.2 requires autocomplete on personal-info fields for accessibility. Beyond compliance, correct autocomplete makes checkout a 2-tap experience for returning buyers, huge for mobile conversion.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
31MediumCHK-020 · formsCheckout

Ship-to same as billing offered as default

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The checkout does not offer a "Same as shipping" checkbox for the billing address, with the box checked by default. Buyers have to type their address twice. (This rule only applies to physical-product stores.)

Why it matters

For most orders, billing and shipping addresses are the same. Making the buyer re-enter their address is duplicate work and a common source of typos.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
32MediumCHK-021 · formsCheckout

Phone number field explains why it is needed (or is optional)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The phone number field is required with no explanation why. Buyers who value their privacy hesitate or abandon.

Why it matters

"Why does a t-shirt store need my phone number?" is a real objection. Without a rationale, some shoppers will not give it and will leave.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
33MediumCHK-024 · formsCheckout

Form labels visible above fields (not placeholder-only)

Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The checkout form uses placeholder-only labels: the field's purpose is shown as grey text inside the input, and disappears the moment the buyer starts typing.

Why it matters

Placeholder-only labels violate WCAG accessibility, but they also just cost sales. A buyer who types a wrong value, then forgets what the field was for, has to erase everything to see the label again. Frustration compounds.

What to do

Add small persistent labels (e.g. 'Email', 'First name', 'Address Line 1', 'City', 'State', 'ZIP code', 'Card number', 'Expiry', 'CVV') above or beside each input box similar to the Shopify checkout pattern, instead of relying solely on the gray placeholder text that disappears on typing.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
4h front-end
estimated
34MediumCHK-035 · trustCheckout

Trust/security signals visible near payment step

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The payment step doesn't show any trust or security signals near the payment fields (padlock icon, "Secure checkout", PCI badge, Verified by Visa).

Why it matters

Buyers are at their most anxious when typing card numbers. A visible security signal near the field removes that anxiety and lifts conversion.

What to do

Add a small padlock icon with 'Secure checkout' text directly above or beside the CONTACT/Email field (near the 'Sign in' link at y~0.27) so shoppers see trust cues before entering personal data, and repeat a PCI/SSL badge near the future payment fields once they load.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
35MediumCHK-036 · trustCheckout

Contact/help option accessible during checkout (phone, chat)

Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.
Desktop view. The pin marks where this belongs. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

There's no visible way to reach help from the checkout page: no phone number, no chat widget, no "Need help?" link.

Why it matters

When something goes wrong mid-checkout (a declined card, a missing address field), a visible help option is the difference between recovery and abandonment.

What to do

Add a persistent 'Need help?' link or chat bubble in the top header next to the GYMSHARK logo, or place a small 'Questions? Contact us' link beneath the 'Express checkout' heading so shoppers stuck on address or payment fields (like the empty Address Line 1 or Credit/Debit Card fields shown) can get support without leaving the page.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
1h content
estimated
36MediumCHK-040 · mobileCheckout

Payment form supports mobile browser autofill for card details

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Checkout, first stepPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The card-payment form is missing the `autocomplete` attributes mobile browsers need to autofill saved cards.

Why it matters

iOS and Android can autofill a saved card in one tap when the fields are labeled correctly. Without it, the buyer types 16 digits, expiry, and CVV manually, and many abandon.

Impact
0.2–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
37MediumCRT-A02 · agentAI Shoppers

No session trap that breaks agent-driven cart hydration

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:09 PM

The problem

The cart URL contains a session token, so opening it in a different browser or by an agent yields an empty cart. Cart state is not portable.

Why it matters

Agentic commerce workflows hand off the cart between the buyer, the agent, and payment providers. If the cart URL is session-bound, that handoff breaks and the buyer has to start over.

Impact
0–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
38MediumCHK-A04 · agentAI Shoppers

Delegated-payment compatibility signals present (tokenization endpoints)

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

The checkout does not declare support for delegated-payment (ACP tokenization). Agents cannot pass a tokenized payment method on the buyer's behalf.

Why it matters

Delegated-payment is the piece that actually lets agents complete a purchase without asking the buyer to type their card. Stripe and PayPal both support this via their ACP modes. Without it, agents can prep the order but hand it back to the buyer to finalize.

Impact
0–0.7%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
39LowPDP-013 · decisionProduct page

Quantity selector present and easy to use (tap-friendly on mobile)

Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.
Mobile view, zoomed to the issue location. Click to open the full screenshot.Product page, second product we sampledPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:05 PMSecond product we sampled: www.gymshark.com/products/gymshark-everyday-seamless-long...A cookie banner (or chat window) was open when we took this picture; the check concerns the page behind it.

The problem

The quantity selector on this product page is either missing on mobile, or too small to tap comfortably.

Why it matters

Fat-finger errors turn quick purchases into frustrating ones. Apple's tap-target guideline is 44px minimum; anything smaller mistaps often on real thumbs.

What to do

Add a quantity stepper (- / number / +) below the 'Learn more' link and above the color swatches, using at least 44x44px tap targets in the same dark/black style as the 'New' badge for consistency.

Impact
0.1–0.4%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h front-end
estimated
40LowCRT-A03 · agentAI Shoppers

Cart line items include machine-readable product IDs/GTINs

Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.
Desktop view. This is where the fix belongs.CartDesktop view, 1440pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:09 PM

The problem

Cart line items do not include machine-readable product identifiers (SKU, GTIN, product_id). Agents see only display names.

Why it matters

Without a stable identifier per line, agents cannot cross-check items against a catalog, apply price rules, or reconcile the order. Display names change with translation and localization, they are not safe identifiers.

Impact
0–0.4%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
2h back-end
estimated
41LowCHK-042 · mobileCheckout

No layout jumps when form errors appear

Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.
Mobile view. This is where the fix belongs.Checkout, first stepPhone view, 390pxCaptured Sep 8, 2026, 10:10 PM

The problem

When an error message appears, the form visibly jumps, moving fields under the buyer's cursor or thumb.

Why it matters

Layout jumps cause mis-clicks and lose the buyer's place in the form. On mobile they routinely cause wrong-field input.

Impact
0.1–0.4%
of checkouts, estimated
Fix effort
3h front-end
estimated
AI ShoppersHow the store performs for AI shopping agents and AI search

An AI assistant can find Gymshark. It cannot complete a purchase there.

UXFix scores every store twice: once for human shoppers, once for the agents now doing the browsing on their behalf. Gymshark scores 57 for humans and 33 for agents. The gap is the part most stores have not looked at yet. 9 of the 12 agent rules are not fully met.

AI Shoppers score
33/100
AI search visibility
3of 8

Derived from this store's own captured product-page content. Coverage judges whether that content answers each query — it is not a measurement of search volume or of what any AI currently recommends.

What an agent could read
Price and availability present in DOM as text (not JS/image only)PDP-A02
No CAPTCHA-only gate without accessible agent pathCHK-A02
What it could not
Complete Product schema.org: price, availability, GTIN/SKU, rating, shipping detailsPDP-A01
Machine checkout readiness signals (ACP/UCP endpoints declared)CHK-A01
No session trap that breaks agent-driven cart hydrationCRT-A02
Delegated-payment compatibility signals present (tokenization endpoints)CHK-A04
Structured errors returned in machine-readable format for agent flowsCHK-A05
~llms.txt present at root; product URLs not bot-blockedPDP-A03
~Canonical URLs stable; variant URLs machine-readable and permanentPDP-A04
~Cart state reachable via stable URL or API endpointCRT-A01
Cart line items include machine-readable product IDs/GTINsCRT-A03
AI search results we ran
best seamless long sleeve tops for gym workouts
Covered"Designed for any kind of training such as running, lifting, studio... made from soft seamless fabric"
what should I wear for running, lifting and studio training
Covered"Designed for any kind of training such as running, lifting, studio"
long sleeve gym top that isn't too tight or see-through
PartialOnly 'body fit' and 'subtle contouring' mentioned, no opacity or squat-proof claims
Gymshark Everyday Seamless vs Vital seamless collection comparison
PartialBoth 'Everyday Seamless' and 'Vital' listed as nav collections with no comparative text
gift ideas for a woman who does pilates
Partial'Pilates Outfits' listed under Shop by Activity but no gift framing anywhere
affordable comfortable gym clothes that feel lightweight
Covered"The comfiest affordable gym staple" and "So lightweight you'll barely notice it's there"
what size should I order in Gymshark seamless tops
Partial"On average 15 reviewers say this product is true to size" and a Size Guide link, but no measurement chart shown
best women's leggings with pockets for gym
Partial'Leggings With Pockets' appears only as a nav category with no product detail on this page

Questions this audit answers

What is Gymshark's UX audit score?

Gymshark (gymshark.com) scored 57/100 on 8 September 2026 in UXFix's independent audit of its product page, cart and checkout, judged on 91 of the 115 rules run.

What are the biggest UX issues on gymshark.com?

The audit found 37 failing checks. The costliest: errors preserve entered data (never clear the form on error), price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile and cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate.

Can AI shopping agents read Gymshark's store?

Gymshark scores 33/100 on UXFix's AI Shoppers rules, which test whether an AI agent can read price, stock and shipping from the store and complete a purchase there.

How was this audit conducted?

UXFix ran the same 115 deterministic rules it runs on every store: a full purchase walk on desktop and mobile, from product page to payment step, using only the public storefront. No store data or analytics access was used, and every finding is shown with the captured screen.

How does Gymshark compare with other audited stores?

Against 20 scored stores in the UXFix benchmark, Gymshark ranks 12 with 57/100. The benchmark median is 59. As of 8 September 2026.

Conclusion

Gymshark is not a badly built store. It passes 42 of 91 assessable rules. What it has is a band of friction between the product page and the payment step, and every part of it is named above.

The 41 findings above come to roughly 119 developer hours of estimated effort in total. Most are settings or template changes rather than rebuilds. A further 12 rules are only partly met and worth a look after these.

The pattern repeats across the stores we audit: the score is rarely lost on visual design, and it is rarely lost in one place. It is lost on when the cost appears, how many decisions stand between a shopper and paying, and whether a machine can read any of it.

If they fix three things
  1. Errors preserve entered data (never clear the form on error) 4h front-end
  2. Price visible without scroll or interaction on desktop and mobile 2h front-end
  3. Cart shows full cost breakdown: items, shipping estimate, tax estimate 2h front-end
Now
57
Projected
53

Modelled, not measured. We re-audit for free to check.

Get your store audited

The same rules, the same evidence, the same estimates, on your product page, cart and checkout. Free, no card, about two minutes.

Cite or embed this audit

Quote the score with its date, or embed the live badge. The badge links back to this page and stays current if we re-audit.

Citation
UXFix (2026). Gymshark UX and conversion audit: 57/100. Audited 8 September 2026. https://uxfix.ai/audits/gymshark-com
Embed snippet
<a href="https://uxfix.ai/audits/gymshark-com"><img src="https://uxfix.ai/audits/gymshark-com/badge.svg" alt="UXFix score: Gymshark 57/100" width="220" height="48" /></a>

More case studies

Recent audits from the same benchmark corpus.

Wpfactory
wpfactory.com
70/100
Forever21
forever21.com
57/100
Eddiebauer
eddiebauer.com
62/100

Disclaimer

This is an independent audit. It was not sponsored, commissioned, paid for or reviewed by Gymshark, and UXFix has no commercial relationship with the store. Findings were produced from the public storefront on 8 September 2026 and may no longer reflect the live site. Conversion figures are estimates modelled from published abandonment research, not from the store's own analytics. Store name and screens are used for commentary and comparison. If you work at Gymshark and would like this page corrected or removed, email [email protected].

Findings reflect gymshark.com as captured on 8 September 2026. Stores change; if something here no longer matches the live site, email [email protected] and we will re-check and republish.

All case studiesArticlesPricingRead the full methodology